4
Islam and the West:
An Equivocal Encounter
The history of the relationship between the world’s two largest monotheistic religions is a long and multilayered one. Although Muhammad taught that Judaism and Christianity were precursors to Islam and Medieval Christians borrowed heavily from the more advanced Muslims, conflict has been as frequent as collaboration. Other than trade, war has perhaps been the most common language between the followers of two religions, and they have invaded the territories of each other on many occasions. Uncovering the complex layers of religious and cultural interdependence and conflict between the two religions is like peeling the many fine layers of an onion with all the implications that entails. Today, there are dissident voices in the Middle East, and many are disturbed by the materialism represented by Western capitalism. In reaction to these foreign forces and the globalization of the economy, fundamentalist religious groups have emerged in many countries challenging this view of the world. Along with these have appeared militant jihadi groups. Many voices are calling for a return to the fundamental principles of family, female seclusion, and Quranic law. Although many Muslims live in terms of pluralism and acceptance of non-Muslim ways, others see the threat to their way of life in global capitalism and listen to the call of fundamentalists to re-affirm traditional values.
In the twentieth century, the Muslim world emerged from centuries of political and economic isolation and colonialism to establish a series of nation-states. By the last half of that century the newly independent Muslim states took their place as important powers on the world stage. Now, in the twenty-first century the Muslim world includes more than one billion people. They are the dominant population in thirty-five countries extending from Morocco in North Africa to Kazakhstan in Central Asia and Indonesia on the east. Islam has re-emerged as a cosmopolitan, cultural and religious presence, reclaiming its rich heritage. Although there is anger in the Muslim world toward international influences that seem to be threatening the traditional way of life, there are also moderates advocating cultural adaptations between the West and traditional Islamic values.
The Christian West has been in close and continuous contact with the Muslim world for the 1300 years, and the two have a history of repeated invasions and attempts to dominate the other. Christendom has had a higher level of conflict with the Muslim world than any other part of the world over the centuries. Many factors contribute to this history of conflict, starting with geographic proximity. Second, is the fact that both are monotheistic traditions that claim an exclusive truth, rejecting any competing claims. Since their claims are mutually exclusive, the potential for conflict is ever present. Global capitalism and the cultural expansionism of the West are additional factors that threaten Muslim traditionalists. The revolutionary cocktail of a history of former greatness mixed with a lack of contemporary power and influence can lead to explosive results.
This history of conflict between Christendom and Islam began when the Muslims invaded Spain in 711 and shortly afterwards France. Although their occupation of France was short-lived, they were in Spain for almost eight hundred years. Then, in 1099 Christian crusaders invaded the Middle East and took much of modern day Lebanon and Israel along with Jerusalem. The Christian invasion of the Middle East marked the beginning of militant Christianity. Although the 9/11 attack on the United States and subsequent invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq by the United States are the most visible contemporary confrontations between Christendom and Islam, these are the most recent incidents in a long multi-layered history. In addition to warfare, Christians and Muslims have a rich history of cultural exchange and commerce, beginning in Spain.
Contributions of Muslim Civilization to Western Civilization
The most visible influence of Muslim culture in Western Europe can be seen in Spain which has a rich heritage of Muslim influences in various areas of life. Muslim architecture can be seen in the world famous Alhambra palace in Granada, the Alcazar of Seville, and the Mosque of Córdoba among others. The influence of Muslim architecture can be seen especially in southern Spain the interior courtyards, arched-colonnades, white-washed walls, and red-tiled roofs, all borrowed from Muslim North Africa. Other influences can be seen in the Spanish language where the vocabularies for city government (alcalde), horse back riding (jinete), construction (albañil), ceramic technology (alfarero), mathematics (algebra), and many others are adopted from Arabic. Muslims also introduced new irrigation techniques for farming. One of the important Muslim influences in Spain that spread to Europe and beyond were in the tanning and decoration of leather. More refined, almost cloth-like, leather could be produced, and it was elaborately decorated in relief with organic designs, a tradition that was to be further developed later in Mexico and the Southwest of the United States. Beyond these direct influences of Muslim culture in Spain, Europeans borrowed extensively from Muslim learning and engineering which was more advanced at the time.
When Western Europe was emerging from the Dark Ages in the early Medieval period, Europe turned to the Middle East for science, mathematics, and knowledge from the classical civilizations of Greek and Rome. Muslim culture valued learning and knowledge, and at that time the Muslim world was the center of learning. Since Islam is a religion centered on law, jurisprudence is of central importance. Madrassas, or religious schools, were established to study Muslim law and other religious knowledge. The madrassa was centered around a teacher, or sheik, and students chose a school based on the reputation of its teacher. Elementary education started with the memorization of the Quran, and more advanced study included religious law and other subjects. These schools were only for men which meant that few women had the opportunity to educate themselves. During the empire periods, the Muslim world was cosmopolitan and scholarship spread quickly from all ends of the empire, Central Asia to North Africa.
Muslim scholarship was at the forefront of medical science, mathematics, and philosophy at this time. In Baghdad, doctors began working with proto-germ theory and opened the first hospitals. Muslim medical science reached an apex with Avicenna, also known as Ibn Sina, who worked during the early eleventh century. His book, al-Qanun, became the authoritative medical text, bringing together the best of classical Greek and Arabic medical knowledge. He described the nature of contagious diseases such as tuberculosis, and he compiled a list of 760 medicines that could be used to treat various diseases. There were other important scientists, such as al-Zahrawi, who described the medical procedures for such things as cauterizing wounds and pulverizing stones in the bladder. Al-Razi wrote a medical treatises and manuals on a wide range of topics which were translated into Latin and widely read in the West. His teachings on gynecology and child-care were commonly followed in the West by both physicians and midwives. During the Medieval period in Europe, the best medical science was borrowed from the Middle East. But, the advances were not only in medical science but also in mathematics.
Europe also borrowed the more sophisticated mathematical system from Muslim scholars. The basis of the system was originally developed by Hindu scholars and then borrowed by the Muslims. These Hindu numerals included the zero (which did not exist in Latin numerals), and it was easier to multiply and divide which led to an important growth in the mathematical sciences from algebra to trigonometry and geometry. The old cumbersome Latin numerical system was replaced in Europe with the much more efficient Arabic numerals which have now become the world standard. A ninth century Persian scholar, al-Khwarizmi, wrote the first algebra textbook and essentially created that field. He also compiled the best astronomical tables of the day that were to become the basis for later research in that area for scholars from Europe to Asia. The practical benefits of this new numerical system ranged from engineering to bookkeeping, making calculations and records more flexible and accurate.
Philosophy was another area of important scholarship in the Muslim world of that period, and it was seen as a branch of theology. In the ninth century the House of Wisdom was established in Baghdad as a center to accumulate the existing knowledge of the world (primarily Persian, Hindu, and Greek) and translate it into Arabic. Humayn ibn-Ishaq, a Nestorian Christian, directed this center of learning in its early years, a reflection of the religious tolerance in the early Muslim world. Ibn-Ishaq systematically collected the classical works of Greek philosophy and science. They translated Aristotle’s collected works as well as the complete medical writings of Hippocrates which contributed to the work of Avicenna. Muslim philosophers used the classical Greek writings to develop their own ideas of society, ethics, and politics. Al-Kindi, working in the early years of the House of Wisdom, theorized about ethical conduct by humans as affected by their relationship to God and the cosmos. In another case, al-Farabi borrowed from Plato’s Republic and Aristotle’s Politics to develop his own ideas about the moral and intellectual qualities of rulers and how they should rule for the well-being of their citizens.
In the Medieval period, the Muslim and Christian worlds came together in libraries and bookstores of Córdoba and Toledo in Spain where important centers of translation emerged. Two of the greatest Medieval rationalist scholars came from Córdoba, Averröes, Islam’s great authority on Aristotle, and Moses Maimonides, the Jewish Biblical scholar, philosopher, and medical scientist. In the twelfth century European scholars developed a strong interest in Arabic and classical Greek writings on medical science, mathematics, and philosophy, and these works were translated from Arabic into Latin. It was Muslim scholarship that saved the writings of the classical Greek world and built on those to create new levels of knowledge which the Europeans borrowed. Western science and philosophy were built on the foundations prepared by Muslim scholars.
In contrast to the Muslim influence on the West, very little was borrowed by the Muslims from Europe. They looked on the Medieval Europeans as “ignorant infidels”, and the crudeness of life in European cities contrasted with the cosmopolitan cultures of Baghdad and Córdoba. Although Muslims were considered to have the best armies in the world at the time, they did borrow some ideas about fortifications and advances in weaponry from the Europeans.
Religion was one area in which neither culture influenced the other in any significant way, especially in formal theology. The one area where there might have been contact was mysticism because Muslim Sufism was not unknown to Christian mystics of the time. Christian Medieval mysticism developed from the experiences and writings of Hildegard of Bingen who lived at the time of greatest Muslim influence on the West. Her knowledge of Muslim scholarship is reflected in her writings on medicine and the classification of the natural world, including plants, animals, and astronomy. She helped develop a tradition of Christian mysticism and is known for her mystical writings and the rich theology that she developed from her visions. Although direct evidence is lacking, her connection with God through mysticism is certainly reminiscent of what had been occurring in Muslim mysticism and given that she was aware of Muslim writings, it suggests that she may have been influenced by that tradition of mysticism.
Mutual Fear and Intimidation: Christendom and Islam
Although Christianity and Islam are related monotheistic religions that worship the same God and trace their religious heritage to the same common ancestor, their relationship has alternated between cultural collaboration and distrust, leading to warfare. The history of repeatedly invading the other to establish their political system, religion, and way of life has left a trail of death, destroyed towns and cities, and religious intolerance in which each group has demonized the other.
Muslim Invasions of Europe. The Muslim invasion of Christian Syria and Egypt shortly after the death of Muhammad started this long history of confrontation between two religions and ways of life. In 711 Muslim forces invaded Spain and pushed their way deep into France. They burned and sacked towns and sold people into slavery which started the history of European fear of the Muslims. The culture of fear of the Muslims can be seen in literature, such as Dante’s Divine Comedy which describes Muslims as enemies, who are guilty of heinous acts against humanity. Even European children’s games (i.e. Moros en la costa) project Muslims as the bogeyman who will catch innocent children, reflecting the fear of Muslim invasion.
With the rise of the Ottoman Empire in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, Muslims once again invaded Europe, but this time from the East. Again, Muslim armies marched through Christian countries burning towns and creating the mayhem of war. The struggles left over from that period of Muslim occupation of Europe can still be seen in the Balkan countries today. However, Christians have been equally active invading Muslim lands, creating a counterpart fear in the Middle East.
In Spain Muslims, Christians, and Jews lived side by side and shared knowledge of each other’s cultures, languages, and religions, but that was not the case in the rest of Europe. There were no Muslim communities in Europe and, of course, no mosques. As a result, Muslims did not travel there. If they needed business or diplomacy to be done, they would send Christian or Jewish emissaries. Although Muslim scholarship was rich about other parts of the world, it included very little information on European languages, culture, and religion. The Muslim world was rich and the center of civilization, Europe was not, so there was little cultural interest in this backward part of the world. Europe had little to contribute in scholarship to the Muslim world, so it was ignored. In contrast, European scholars actively studied Arabic and Muslim culture, and Arabic studies programs were established in European universities. Muslims were viewed by Europeans with a mixture of awe of their wealth and sophistication and fear of their military power and religion.
Christendom Viewed from the Middle East. The Crusades and the later invasions of the Muslim world by European imperial powers created a history of fear of the West in the Arab world. When the Crusader knights of the West arrived to the Holy Land in 1099 to re-establish Christian control over the holy sites, they brought a war of destruction that was shocking to the Arabs who were more accustomed to negotiating the surrender of civilian populations rather than annihilating them. Tens of thousands of civilians were slaughtered in Jerusalem, and thousands were even killed on the holy mount at the al-Aksa Mosque, the third holiest site in Islam. Actually, many of those killed were Christians and Jews living in Jerusalem, but since they looked Middle Eastern, and the Crusaders did not distinguish between them and the Muslims. So, they killed them all. In contrast, when Saladin re-conquered Jerusalem eighty-eight years later in 1187, he protected the civilian population and established a rule of religious tolerance for Christians, Jews, and Muslims. Muslims are proud of the fact that Saladin did not massacre Christians, and they are quick to point that out to people today. Saladin is an icon, and he is honored in many parts of the Middle East, in story and in statues such as one that stands in Damascus before the main gate entering the central marketplace.
Later attempts at creating Christian crusades failed, and for the next four centuries the people of the Middle East had to contend more with internal struggles and fighting off the invading Mongols that worry about the Christian West. In fact the tables turned against the Christians in 1453, when the Ottoman Turks conquered Constantinople, renaming it Istanbul. By the early 1500's, they had occupied most of Eastern Europe, almost taking Vienna in 1529. The strength of the Ottoman armies held the Europeans back until the nineteenth century when their rule began to weaken.
Muslims see this contrast between Christian and Muslim behavior repeated in subsequent history, especially with the British and French colonial presence in the Middle East in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries when thousands of Muslims were again killed by Christian forces suppressing opposition. It would repeat with the United States invasion of Iraq in 2003. The colonial control of the Middle East by these European Christian powers emphasized the powerlessness of the Arab world and its civilization. That pattern continued with the perceived imposition of the state of Israel on the Middle East by the European powers in the United Nations.
In the Muslim world, many see Israel, and the United States protection of it, as a new European crusade threatening Arab civilization. The Israeli defeat of the Arab armies in the 1967 war humiliated them once again, emphasizing their powerlessness, and at that point the Muslim fundamentalist movement began growing again in the Middle East. The two United States led wars against Iraq and the privations and deaths caused by those wars are evidence to many of the disdain of Americans for their religion and civilization. The intervention of the United States in Saudi Arabia, Iran, Afghanistan, and other Muslim countries are additional signs to many that the United States has only ill will for Muslims. In the Middle East some people dream of another Saladin, a just man who could drive back the Christian West and defend the religious and cultural integrity of Islam.
The Colonial Interlude and the Emergence of Nationalism
After the fall of the Ottoman Empire at the end of World War I, the British and French moved to stake out colonial claims to Middle Eastern territories that had been under Ottoman rule, including present day Israel, Palestine, Jordan, Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, Kuwait, Yemen, and parts of Saudi Arabia. Although Arabs and Turks were united by Islamic beliefs and culture, they were separated by language and local traditions. The Arabs were also marginalized within the Ottoman Empire, so that as the Empire weakened Arab nationalism grew. After the fall of the Turks, the French and British tried to divide up the region under their colonial rule, however, Turkish, Arab, Iranian, and Jewish nationalists reacted violently against them. During the 1920's and 1930's, the various nationalist groups fought to create their own nation-states, and the British and French were forced to withdraw completely from the Middle East in the late 1940's following World War II. This was the last gasp at European colonial expansion.
The most important Arab leader was Hussein ibn-Ali (1856-1931) who claimed direct descent from the prophet Muhammad and the Quraysh clan. He was the chief magistrate of Mecca and ruled the territory along the Red Sea in the name of the Turks. In 1916 he declared independence from the Ottoman Empire and declared himself the King of the Arabs, the British supported him. In events narrated in the movie Lawrence of Arabia, the British sent T.E. Lawrence in 1917 to work with Hussein’s Bedouin troops in a guerrilla war against the Turkish army in the Sinai desert. By 1918 these groups along with the British regular army had pushed the Turks back to their own borders, and the son of Hussein, Faisal, entered Damascus in an Arab victory. In 1920, Syria and Iraq declared themselves as independent countries, but the French promptly invaded Syria, making it a colonial “protectorate”, and the British did the same to Iraq. Faisal was named King in Iraq, and in 1932 he was able to negotiate independence from Britain. In 1936 Syria gained the promise of independence from France.
During these events in the Middle East, Spain and France also occupied Algeria and Morocco in North Africa until they received their independence in 1962 and 1956, respectively. The carving up of the Muslim world into small colonial holdings which later became nation-states had the corollary effect of dividing this world into smaller fragments than had ever existed. The Golden Ages of Islam occurred during the Arab and Ottoman Empire periods when the forces of the Muslim world could be concentrated into a united front. The divided world of modern day Islam means that there is no central power to pull Muslim forces together, making Muslim countries subject to the intervention of outside forces, both those of the Western powers and Islamist militants and warlords.
Muslim Activist Response to Globalism
The West, and especially the United States, has become the “Great Satan” for Muslim fundamentalists groups because of the high profile and power of its corporate and military presence in the Middle East. Although the European countries are more closely tied to the Middle East economically, they have more carefully adapted their presence to local cultural demands, something the Americans have not done so well. When people from this part of the world explain why they are against the United States, they frequently say that it is because of the lack of respect for their values and traditions. Although this may be the result of ignorance of those traditions, the fact of violating them is insulting. For a proud people with the longest history of civilization in the world, the indignity of disrespect is an insult that can lead to anger.
Across Africa, the Middle East, India, Indonesia to the Philippines, Islamists are resisting Western influences in their societies, and their resistance can turn to violence. The violent stage of the struggle against non-Western forces started as the Arab forces opposed European colonialism, and it has spread into some thirty conflict points throughout the Muslim world. Militant Islamic groups have become the opposition to the existing governments in Muslim countries from North Africa to Central Asia. Although most of their militant activity is focused against their own governments, Israel and the United States are also targets for these groups. The exclusive vision of monotheism creates an all or nothing vision of the world for fundamentalists (Muslim, Jewish, or Christian) which can lead them to demonize everyone who does not accept their ideology. Once the people of the other side have been demonized, violence against them is justified. Bernard Lewis says,
If, then, we are to understand anything at all about what is happening in the Muslim world at the present time and what has happened in the past, there are two essential points that need to be grasped. One is the universality of religion as a factor in the lives of the Muslim peoples, and the other is its centrality.
Religious belief and faith are at the center of social and political action in the Muslim world. The Muslim Brotherhood was the forerunner of modern Muslim militancy, and it has been the model for most contemporary Islamic activist movements. It was founded in Egypt in 1928 by Sheik Hassan al-Banna, a schoolteacher who dreamed of recreating the golden age of Islam. It rejects Western values, as it did Communism, and advocates the establishment of an Islamic state based on the sharia or Islamic law and under the leadership of a Caliph like the early stages of the Arab Empire after the death of Muhammad. The Brotherhood sees Israel as the enemy of Islam and as an agent of the Western powers. It strongly supports the Palestinian cause and has sent fighters on a number of occasions to fight alongside Palestinians against Israel.
A cluster of other militant groups have been organized around the fight against Israel, and the Islamic groups, Hamas and Islamic Jihad, are the most important. Their purpose is the destruction of Israel and the creation of an Islamic state that would occupy all of the present day territory of Israel, the West Bank, and the Gaza Strip. They carry out bombings and mortar attacks on Israel Defense Force soldiers and on Jewish settlers in areas considered to be Palestinian. They also do suicide bombings in Israeli cities. They receive support from Iran with some logistical support from Syria. They are heirs to the Muslim Brotherhood.
In addition to the Islamic groups, there have been a number of secular nationalist groups that have fought against Israel but which did not appeal directly to a Muslim ideology. The most important of these has been the Fatah group, which dominated the Palestinian Liberation Organization and the Palestinian Authority as it emerged. Fatah has worked with the Islamic groups, especially Hamas, in organizing the Intifadas against Israel. Another secular group in the fight against Israel has been the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine which is a Marxist organization that has had more acceptance among intellectuals but only a small grass-roots following. It has carried out mortar attacks and car bombings but is not considered a major Palestinian organization.
The Hezbollah, or “The Party of God”, is a Lebanese Shi’ite group that has fought with Israel from its base in southern Lebanon. It was organized in 1982 in opposition to the Israeli invasion of Lebanon, and it was originally funded by Iran, but now it is primarily supported by local funding. The Hezbollah inflicted significant losses on the Israeli army during its occupation of southern Lebanon during the 1980's and 1990's. Israel’s withdrawal from southern Lebanon in 2000 was seen as a victory by this group. In spite of the withdrawal, it has continued to make periodic cross border attacks. It has representatives elected to the Lebanese parliament since 1992, and it is active in providing social services to the small town and rural populations of southern Lebanon.
The attacks on the International Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon in Washington on September 11, 2001 brought the transnational Islamic militant group, al Qaeda, “the Base” to the forefront. Since the bombing of the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia in 1996 , al Qaeda has carried out a number of high profile bombings of United States embassies (Kenya and Tanzania) and a ship (U.S.S. Cole in Yemen). This group is directed by Osama bin Laden, and it is reported to have contact with Muslim organizations throughout the thirty-five Muslim nations around the world, as well as Europe and the United States. Bin Laden and others founded al-Qaeda in 1989 to oppose non-Islamic governments and the influence of the West on Muslim countries. Their opposition to the United States grew after the Persian Gulf War in 1991 in reaction to the presence of United States troops in Saudi Arabia, the holy land. They were also opposed to the United States presence in East Africa, especially Somalia.
As a vocal and visible opponent of the United States in the 1990's and onwards, bin Laden became the most charismatic Muslim leader in the world. He is more of a leader of ideas, especially Muslim religious purity, than a leader of tactical forces. His message responds to three major issues:
1. United States troops should not be stationed in Saudi Arabia because they represent a defiling presence in the Muslim Holy Land. Saudi Arabia should not allow the United States to use its soil to attack fellow Muslims.
2. Israel has taken land from Muslim people, and it has occupied the holy sites in Jerusalem. The United States is the primary support for Israel, and the United States is equally to blame for Israel’s actions. The Palestinian cause against Israel should be supported.
3. The Western countries, especially the United States, are the primary representatives of the forces of materialism in the world. Materialism and capitalism are negative influences from the West that threaten the spiritual values of the Muslim world.
The United States led invasion of Iraq in 2003 added one more affront to Muslims and expanded support for the Islamist movement in the Middle East. Iraq has the most important holy sites for the Shi’ites, and with its occupation the West either controlled or had troops in the three most important holy places for the Muslims: Saudi Arabia, Jerusalem, and Iraq. This gave the appearance of a Western stranglehold on the Muslim world. Militancy has grown in places ranging from Palestine to Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Indonesia. Militants are not only against Western interests but any foreign presence that seems to threaten their independence. Contemporary Muslim fundamentalist groups appeal to the glory of that past golden age of Islam which they believe can be re-created by a strict observance of their beliefs. Many see the expansion of the culture of international capitalism as a threat to the values of Islam and the moral rectitude of its peoples. Their demand is for equal participation for Muslim values in the face of rapid changes and internationalization.
Contemporary Muslim Popular Culture:
An Alternate Reaction to Globalism
Literature and the arts frequently are important channels of communication between cultures, and that is the case with Islam and the West. Both Muslim writers and movie-makers speak to their own people and become voices for their societies to people from other cultures. Perhaps no one has done this more elegantly than Naguib Mahfouz. In his acceptance of the Nobel Prize for Literature he made an appeal to the West for understanding between these two major civilizations. Muslim culture is reflected in literature and cinema, opening windows into the unique experience of the people in the Muslim world that Westerners might not otherwise be able to understand. The popular culture of literature and cinema is more important in the lives of most Muslims than is religious fundamentalism. Cinematographers and authors portray the glories of the past of Islam, tell intimate stories of life in the Middle East today, frequently love stories, and some challenge the confines of Islamic restrictions. The movies and the books are an open window providing a vision of the lives of Muslim people today. Sometimes they denounce the jihadists and their attacks on non-Western culture and peoples, and sometimes they defend them as legitimate resistance fighters.
Muslim Writers. In every culture writers express the cultural traditions of the group, and they are frequently the voices that are most accessible to people of other traditions. It is true in the Muslim world. For people who come from the Judeo-Christian traditions of Western European, frequently the main window that we have into the Muslim world is through the writers, and Egyptians hold a most important place in the contemporary literature of the Muslim world. As is true in the Western world, Muslim writers tend to be secular. This has led to problems with the religious establishment within Islam, even leading to fataws calling for their death on occasion. Among the most important writers of recent decades are Gamal al-Ghitani (Zayni Barakat or Servant of the Sultan, Friend of the People, 1996), Sonallah Ibrahim (Sharaf and Cairo from Edge to Edge, both 1998), the grand old man of Muslim letters, Naguib Mahfouz, the winner of the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1988, and Salmon Rushdie. These writers draw careful portraits of their characters, describe real events and situations, and they show a true political commitment to justice which has caused them to be jailed on occasion. These writers are great story-tellers in the Arab tradition, and they draw from material in present day politics and religion and from the past, showing how power is manipulated and dictatorships created.
Mahfouz stands out as a singularly important writer. Although he is versed in the traditions of the West, he is the Muslim world’s most elegant writer about human experience. He was the first writer in Arabic of the modern period to devote himself completely to the writing of novels, and he has written thirty-two of them, as well as thirteen collections of short stories. His characters and stories are rooted in the distinctive locales of Egypt, but they confront universal issues in their lives, which makes his fiction accessible to people of other countries and cultures. His work has been widely adapted to television and cinema, and his characters have become household names in Egypt and other parts of the Muslim world. His early works were set in Pharaonic Egypt and the period when the Egyptians drove out the Hyksos who had ruled them for a time. This work had strong parallels with the modern Egyptian drive to expel the British from their territory. His second stage of works focused on the problems of contemporary Egypt, and it culminated in the publication of a trilogy for which he is most widely known, The Cairo Trilogy. The third stage of his work, starting in the late 1950's and extending over the next couple of decades was dedicated to exploring the individual’s experience with self and with the world. His work was seen as not sufficiently Muslim by some conservative groups, and an Islamist militant, attacked and stabbed him for not being true to Islam. This attack served to point out the power of his writing, and fortunately he survived.
The Pakistani author Salmon Rushdie has challenged the most sensitive political and religious events in recent decades in his home country. He achieved international notoriety after the publication of The Satanic Verses (1988) and the subsequent fatwa (death order) pronounced against him by the Ayatollah Khomeini of Iran. Rushdie wrote one of the most powerful postmodern novels in which he questions whether human beings (i.e. religious leaders in his world) are speaking in the name of God or political expediency. He has also written historical novels, such as Shame, in which he analyzes the political turmoil of his homeland.
Muslim Cinema. Even under the religious controls of the Ayatollah government, Iranian film makers have taken over the leadership of film as an expressive medium in the Muslim world. Their films deal with issues of family loyalty, respect across generations, and the roles of men and women among others. Although they are rarely directly religious, the values of Muslim culture are pervasive. Abbas Kiarostami, Mohsen Makhmalbaf, and Majid Majidi are three of the important contemporary film makers in Iran. Kiarostami is considered by many to be one of the two or three best directors making films in the world today. His films Taste of Cherry (1997) and The Wind Will Carry Us (1999) give an insight into Iranian society and the personal experience of the culture.
Mohsen Makhmalbaf is a unique case in Iranian film. His entire family is involved in the film business, and they are organized as the Makhmalbaf Film House. His daughter, Samira, is also a film maker and has made The Apple (1998), which is a story of two teen-aged girls who are kept imprisoned in their house in a thinly veiled criticism of the seclusion of women, and Blackboards (2002), a story about two teachers in the Kurdish region of Iran. Mohsen is most known for his widely acclaimed film Kandahar (2001) about an Afghan woman journalist who has been living in Canada and returns during the Taliban period to help her ill sister. It is about Afghan tribal culture and how it is affected by the civil war in the country. It received good reviews in the Cannes Film Festival and has shown extensively in Europe and the United States. He has also made A Moment of Innocence (1996), Gabbeh (1997), and The Silence (1998) among others.
Majid Majidi’s films are some of the most beautiful being made today. Children of Heaven (1997) was widely acclaimed, and it was the first Iranian film to be nominated for an Academy Award in the United States as the Best Foreign Language Film. His film, The Color of Paradise (1999), won a number of awards internationally and achieved wide distribution in the United States. The two films above, as well as Baran (2001), have won awards at the Montreal Film Festival. Majidi’s Baran is about Afghan refugees in Iran and their difficulties working and interacting with the larger Iranian society. When Lateef, a Turkic speaking Iranian worker, becomes attracted to a young Afghan woman, their cultures and social separation make the love impossible. While Majidi is obligated by censorship in Iran to use visual metaphor for feelings between a man and woman, he overcomes this constraint by turning film into visual poetry.
Conclusions
The confrontation between Christendom and Islam dominates the world once again as it has so many times in past centuries. Muslim power and influence in the past depended on centralized empires were built by the Arabs or Turks, but today the international political system is organized into nation-states, and the economic system is dominated by transnational corporations. The Muslim world is now divided into forty-eight small nation-states, and no one has the power, wealth, or resources to establish a dominant position for Islam. By the mid-twentieth century, religious and ethnic groups within Islam began to voice their demands after centuries of imperial and colonial subservience. There is a cacophony of voices defining what the new Islam should be for the twenty-first century. Nasser defined it as pan-Arab nationalism, warlords in Afghanistan see it as local power, the royal families of various countries see the future as monarchical, Islamists see it as Muslim, and Turks see it as a democratic republic. The resurgence of the identification with Islam has become the most important voice in the Middle East today.
Boxed Insert One. A Call for a Union of Mankind. Naguib Mahfouz.
Naguib Mahfouz is one of the moderate voices of Islam who calls for greater understanding between the Christian West and the Muslim world. In his 1988 Nobel lecture Mr. Mahfouz spoke from the perspective of Islam and called on the leaders of the industrialized world to provide moral leadership and use their power and position to correct inequities and conflicts in the world.
As for Islamic civilization I will not talk about its call for the establishment of a union between all Mankind under the guardianship of the Creator, based on freedom, equality and forgiveness. Nor will I talk about the greatness of its prophet. For among your thinkers there are those who regard him the greatest man in history. I will not talk of its conquests which have planted thousands of minarets calling for worship, devoutness and good throughout great expanses of land from the environs of India and China to the boundaries of France. Nor will I talk of the fraternity between religions and races that has been achieved in its embrace in a spirit of tolerance unknown to Mankind neither before nor since.
I will, instead, introduce that civilization is a moving dramatic situation summarizing one of its most conspicuous traits: In one victorious battle against Byzantium it has given back its prisoners of war in return for a number of books of the ancient Greek heritage in philosophy, medicine and mathematics. This is a testimony of value for the human spirit in its demand for knowledge, even though the demander was a believer in God and the demanded a fruit of a pagan civilization...
In the olden times every leader worked for the good of his own nation alone. The others were considered adversaries, or subjects of exploitation. There was no regard to any value but that of superiority and personal glory. For the sake of this, many morals, ideals and values were wasted; many unethical means were justified; many uncounted souls were made to perish. Lies, deceit, treachery, cruelty reigned as the signs of sagacity and the proof of greatness. Today, this view needs to be changed from its very source. Today, the greatness of a civilized leader ought to be measured by the universality of his vision and his sense of responsibility towards all humankind. The developed world and the Third World are but one family. Each human being bears responsibility towards it by the degree of what he has obtained of knowledge, wisdom, and civilization. I would not be exceeding the limits of my duty if I told them in the name of the Third World: Be not spectators to our miseries. You have to play therein a noble role befitting your status. From your position of superiority you are responsible for any misdirection of animal, or plant, to say nothing of Man, in any of the four corners of the world. We have had enough of words. Now is the time for action. It is time to end the age of brigands and usurers. We are in the age of leaders responsible for the whole globe. Save the enslaved in the African south! Save the famished in Africa! Save the Palestinians from the bullets and the torture! Nay, save the Israelis from profaning their great spiritual heritage! Save the ones in debt from the rigid laws of economy! Draw their attention to the fact that their responsibility to Mankind should precede their commitment to the laws of a science that Time has perhaps overtaken.
I beg your pardon, ladies and gentlemen, I feel I may have somewhat troubled your calm. But what do you expect from one coming from the Third World? Is not every vessel coloured by what it contains? Besides, where can the moans of Mankind find a place to resound if not in your oasis of civilization planted by its great founder for the service of science, literature and sublime human values? And as he did one day by consecrating his riches to the service of good, in the hope of obtaining forgiveness, we, children of the Third World, demand of the able ones, the civilized ones, to follow his example, to imbibe his conduct, to meditate upon his vision.
Ladies and Gentlemen,
In spite of all what goes on around us I am committed to optimism until the end. I do not say with Kant that Good will be victorious in the other world. Good is achieving victory every day. It may even be that Evil is weaker than we imagine. In front of us is an indelible proof: were it not for the fact that victory is always on the side of Good, hordes of wandering humans would not have been able in the face of beasts and insects, natural disasters, fear and egotism, to grow and multiply. They would not have been able to form nations, to excel in creativeness and invention, to conquer outer space, and to declare Human Rights. The truth of the matter is that Evil is a loud and boisterous debaucherer, and that Man remembers what hurts more than what pleases. Our great poet Abul-'Alaa' Al-Ma'ari was right when he said:
‘A grief at the hour of death
Is more than a hundred-fold
Joy at the hour of birth.’
I finally reiterate my thanks and ask your forgiveness.”
Boxed Insert Two. Jihadis and Family Terror
Wednesday, July 31. 7:00 am. This morning I awoke early to the news that a bomb had exploded at the Hebrew university in Israel where our daughter was doing research. Seven were killed, and eighty were injured. Vanessa carries a cell phone so that we can make sure that she is safe after a bombing. I immediately called, but she did not answer. The machine voice came on saying to leave a message after the beep, which I did, asking her to call us back. Why was she not answering? She always has her phone at hand and answers quickly. My anxiety grew. My wife was still asleep, and I went to the kitchen and started mundane chores to keep my mind occupied, but time dragged on. I called again, still no answer. I turned on the computer and started to write these notes, maybe I could write out my fears.
Later, I heard Gloria in the bedroom, and I knew that she was awake and must have heard the news. I went, and she sat frozen and rigid on the edge of the bed listening to the radio. She knew the possibility as well as I did. I tried to dissimulate my fear saying that maybe Vanessa did not go to the university today. We listened to the continuing drumbeat of news about the dead and injured. Gloria called Vanessa’s phone, and there was no answer. We sat numb, listening to the repeated cycle of the news that we already knew and was already burned indelibly into our minds. The repeat of the news non-news provided the focus for our emptiness during the time that we did not know if our daughter were dead, injured, or alive and well. I felt the emptiness of frozen fear that people feel when terrorism strikes at schools, restaurants, clubs, buses, markets, homes, and other places of daily life.
About 9:30 the phone rang, and Gloria and I both answered on the first ring. A man's voice with an Israeli accent spoke, and my heart sank. Oh no, I thought, we are being notified, something has happened. The terror of an official notification was a jolt that made me tremble. Was she injured, or worse? Through those confused moments, the sound of the voice told me something was wrong, my worst fear. Then, I heard him say that he had spoken with Vanessa. I focused. Why could Vanessa not call? Was she injured? The call seemed strange to me because why would an unknown person be calling us? He said that he knew Vanessa and had called her cell phone when he heard about the attack. He was calling to let us know that he had spoken with her and she was all right, but she could not call. My mind locked onto that phrase. He did not know details and could not tell us any more. We were happy to hear that she was alive, but we were still fearful about why she was unable to call. Was he not telling us all of the truth? If she were physically able, she would be calling us instead of sending messages through someone else. Was she in a hospital and could not call?
With these thoughts flooding our minds, we called her phone again, and as if with a bolt of fresh air, she answered, and we heard her voice. She was all right. By chance she had been not been at the university. She had been in the tunnels under the Temple Mount where the cell phone did not receive the signal, and when she came out the phone system was overloaded because of the bombing.
For the time being my immediate fear was put aside, but it had been honed to a knife's edge. Where will the next bombing be, and will my daughter be in the wrong place at the wrong time? My fear and anxiety were only temporarily calmed by our talk with her. I thought about the people who have this experience on a regular basis and have no escape from it. When does one side or the other become exhausted from the killing and being killed? Why do we as humans all too frequently have trouble accepting the existence of the other that is different from us? My daughter is alive, but today I stared into the face of tragedy. I saw the thousands of mothers and fathers, husbands and wives, brothers and sisters who have stood in the same place and came away seared by grief and death and by the blast of the bomb or shot of the rifle. 10:20 am.
Boxed Insert Three. Timeline for the last Century.
|
The Arab Revolt and the Colonial Period |
|
The Arab Revolt |
1916 |
In 1916 Hussein ibn-Ali declared Arab independence from the Ottomans. |
|
The Muslim Nation State Period: 1932 to present |
|
Turkey |
1923 to present |
Ataturk re-organizes Turkey as a European style republic. |
Egypt |
1922 and 1952 |
Egypt gained partial independence from the Britain in 1922. |
Iran |
1925 to present |
Persia organized as a nation-state in 1925. |
Iraq |
1932 to present |
Faisal was named King of Iraq and negotiated independence from the British. |
Syria |
1936 to present |
Syria gained independence from France. |
Saudi Arabia |
1932 to present |
It was unified into one kingdom in 1932. |
Jordan |
1946 to present |
After the Ottomans the British occupied it until independence. |
|
The Islamist Movements |
|
The Muslim Brotherhood |
1928 |
Formed in Egypt to support Islamic principles and law in government and society. |
Palestinian Islamic movements |
1970's |
Following the 1967 Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip radical Palestinian movements grew. |
Iranian Islamic Revolution |
1979 |
After the establishment of an Islamic theocracy, the Iranian government has supported the Islamic movement. |
Hezbollah |
1982 |
Organized in response to the Israeli invasion of Lebanon. |
al-Qaeda |
1990's |
Following the Persian Gulf War in 1991, al-Qaeda was organized against the West. |
. See Ramadan, Tariq. 2003. Western Muslims and the Future of Islam. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
For more information on the Crusades see Lewis, Bernand. 1966. The Arabs in History. New York: Harper and Row, Publishers. Pages 150 and 164.
. These events and the life of Lawrence are analyzed at length in Mack, John E. 1998. A Prince of our Disorder: The Life of T.E. Lawrence. Reprint edition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. For a brief treatment see Bentley and Ziegler, page 899.
. The Islamist opposition is discussed in Niblock, Tim. 1994. “A Framework for Renewal in the Middle East?” in The Middle East and the New World Order. Edited by Haifaa A. Jawad. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Pages 1-12.
. The political implications in the Middle East of the Muslim Brotherhood, Islamist groups, and Nasser’s Pan-Arabism are discussed in Jawad, Haifaa A. 1994. “Pan-Islamism and Pan-Arabism: Solution or Obstacle to Political Reconstruction in the Middle East?” in The Middle East and the New World Order. Edited by Haifaa A. Jawad. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Pages 99-117.
. For more detailed information on Makhmalbaf’s filmography and the work of film work of other family members go to, http://www.makhmalbaf.com.
Links
* Home * Distinguished Lecture Series
* Digital Resources * Publications * About Us